Butters
04-08 05:30 PM
Or the Microsoft Office ones...
wallpaper Megan Fox amp; Shia LaBeouf Bring
kmuralidhar
08-22 12:12 PM
I am on the same boat. My case was transfered to NSC and my receipt number starts with WAC.
I am a July 2nd 2007 filer. When i spoke with an IO few days back, he told me that they will process according to the NSC processing dates even through the receipt # starts with WAC. The IO has also confirmed that even though the case has got two receipt dates (one with CSC RD and another with NSC RD), they will consider the first one (July 2nd) to process the case.
I am a July 2nd 2007 filer. When i spoke with an IO few days back, he told me that they will process according to the NSC processing dates even through the receipt # starts with WAC. The IO has also confirmed that even though the case has got two receipt dates (one with CSC RD and another with NSC RD), they will consider the first one (July 2nd) to process the case.
JunRN
08-10 06:34 PM
I am waiting too...it may come on Monday instead and so is the 'U' in the Visa Bulletin.
2011 Megan Fox #39;Transformers:
babu123
11-15 03:50 PM
Based on this information, dates wont move until next summer.
I am just off by 16 days. This is really crap...
I am just off by 16 days. This is really crap...
more...
pranju
07-31 12:44 PM
Hi ,
As many of you know that some have filed on their own and not through lawyer , pls update here if any of the self filers have received a RN or check got cashed .
also what is the alternative if we don't receive RN before 17th august , self filer are you planning to refile ?
CC = check cashed
RN = Receipt Notice
Thanks
As many of you know that some have filed on their own and not through lawyer , pls update here if any of the self filers have received a RN or check got cashed .
also what is the alternative if we don't receive RN before 17th august , self filer are you planning to refile ?
CC = check cashed
RN = Receipt Notice
Thanks
gc28262
09-15 06:27 PM
Members,
Please post all 2009 EB3 485 approvals on this thread.
Please mention the following details:
Approval Date:
Country chargeable to:
Priority date:
Are you a 245i beneficiary: Yes/No
Let us see whether any regular EB3 guys are getting approved as per latest visa bulletins.
Please post all 2009 EB3 485 approvals on this thread.
Please mention the following details:
Approval Date:
Country chargeable to:
Priority date:
Are you a 245i beneficiary: Yes/No
Let us see whether any regular EB3 guys are getting approved as per latest visa bulletins.
more...
pvadduri
01-25 11:17 AM
I am one of the unfortunate few who could not cash in on the July/Aug 2007 opportunity to file I-485 due to my Law Firm's mistake. Here are the details of my case:
- My labor was approved June 28 2007 (EB3, Traditional, Priority date March 2005)
- I-140/I-485/EAD/AP were all filed concurrently on Aug 7, 2007 (before the Aug 17th deadline)
- My Lawfirm missed the signature on the check for the I-140 application, resulting in everything being returned
- By the time the package came back, signatures were corrected and sent back , it was well after Aug 17th.
- CIS accepted the I-140 application but rejected my I-485/EAD/AP saying that there are no Visa numbers available since it was after Aug 17th.
- My Lawfirm refiled with covering letter explaining the issue,using the Fedex receipts from the original Aug 7th filing etc..but the CIS has not accepted it.
- My Employer tried a Congressional inquiry with the CIS explaining my specific case - but that came back with same response: No visa number avialability
My Lawfirm and Employer are saying - Sorry - nothing else can be done now...
I am the one suffering because of my Law firm's mistake. Is there anything else that I can do to come out of this distress?. I would very much appreciate any inputs from people who have knowledge of similar scenarios!
- My labor was approved June 28 2007 (EB3, Traditional, Priority date March 2005)
- I-140/I-485/EAD/AP were all filed concurrently on Aug 7, 2007 (before the Aug 17th deadline)
- My Lawfirm missed the signature on the check for the I-140 application, resulting in everything being returned
- By the time the package came back, signatures were corrected and sent back , it was well after Aug 17th.
- CIS accepted the I-140 application but rejected my I-485/EAD/AP saying that there are no Visa numbers available since it was after Aug 17th.
- My Lawfirm refiled with covering letter explaining the issue,using the Fedex receipts from the original Aug 7th filing etc..but the CIS has not accepted it.
- My Employer tried a Congressional inquiry with the CIS explaining my specific case - but that came back with same response: No visa number avialability
My Lawfirm and Employer are saying - Sorry - nothing else can be done now...
I am the one suffering because of my Law firm's mistake. Is there anything else that I can do to come out of this distress?. I would very much appreciate any inputs from people who have knowledge of similar scenarios!
2010 Official Megan Fox
Nikith77
03-08 08:50 PM
Hi Bro
Sorry for your mother. I can only pray for you and your mother.
Take her back to india so that you she can have a better treatment.
Sorry for your mother. I can only pray for you and your mother.
Take her back to india so that you she can have a better treatment.
more...
immidude
06-08 04:36 PM
I am July filer got 485 RFE
seems like my prev attorney made a mistake and answered yes to "Have you ever before applied for permanent resident status in the U.S"
- well this is going to cost me
My question(s)
i changed job(and company) do i need to send AC21 along with RFE response.
and also can i send my medical records along with RFE (medical records i submitted are incomplete and says chickenpox vaccination needed now i am vaccinated and got the records of it).
if yes do i still need USCIS doctor to submit these medical records.
seems like my prev attorney made a mistake and answered yes to "Have you ever before applied for permanent resident status in the U.S"
- well this is going to cost me
My question(s)
i changed job(and company) do i need to send AC21 along with RFE response.
and also can i send my medical records along with RFE (medical records i submitted are incomplete and says chickenpox vaccination needed now i am vaccinated and got the records of it).
if yes do i still need USCIS doctor to submit these medical records.
hair hot Megan Fox @ quot
sweet_jungle
09-30 02:20 AM
With GC process bound to take long, staying at the same place to avoid changing address may be a big challenge.
Has anybody considered using PO box for address on I-485? My lawyer did not allow me to use PO box during July 2 filing.
Will it be possible to go online and change to PO box address for I-485?
Does INS has any issues in sending GC to po box address?
Has anybody considered using PO box for address on I-485? My lawyer did not allow me to use PO box during July 2 filing.
Will it be possible to go online and change to PO box address for I-485?
Does INS has any issues in sending GC to po box address?
more...
MYGCBY2010
07-23 03:12 PM
Me and my spouse both work on H1B and I am applying for I-485 along with EAD/AP for both me and my spouse. My question is since my spouse is already in H1B with certain job title which was mentioned in one of the documents that was filled with i-485, when spouse uses EAD does she need to be looking for similiar jobs only?. Please clarify. Thanks in advance.
hot Megan Fox At Germany Premiere
aim-high
03-24 04:32 PM
I am planning to apply for Schengen visa in an Italian consulate. I have an expired H1 but a valid AP. According to the italian consulate website, here is one of the visa requirements
"passport or travel document valid for at least three months after visa expiry date"
My passport is expiring in 2 years but my AP will be expiring in about 2 1/2 months from the Schengen visa expiry. Will I have an issue getting a visa ?
Do I have a workaround ?
Thanks
"passport or travel document valid for at least three months after visa expiry date"
My passport is expiring in 2 years but my AP will be expiring in about 2 1/2 months from the Schengen visa expiry. Will I have an issue getting a visa ?
Do I have a workaround ?
Thanks
more...
house Megan Fox **UK TABLOID
whitecollarslave
03-06 10:14 AM
See this FAQ - http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq_consumer_cobra.HTML
There is a phone number for Benefits Advisors in the FAQ above. You can call them and find out for your specific situation.
There is a phone number for Benefits Advisors in the FAQ above. You can call them and find out for your specific situation.
tattoo megan fox transformers 2
anandrajesh
01-31 10:07 PM
Correct, donot waste your time predicting, rather use it for packing your bags!!
Absolutely... As days go by, i am inclined more on packing my bags and leaving, than pursuing my American Dream.
All these predictions are joke. Dont waste your time. Admins should close this Thread.
Absolutely... As days go by, i am inclined more on packing my bags and leaving, than pursuing my American Dream.
All these predictions are joke. Dont waste your time. Admins should close this Thread.
more...
pictures Megan Fox Actress Megan Fox
krishna_brc
12-07 01:55 AM
yes you can use AP, when you transfer your H1B to new company.
Thankyou
Thankyou
dresses Megan Fox #39;Transformers:
sumansk
12-21 09:33 AM
Nice article.. I wish they read it and change their opinion.The problem with these guys is that they just dont understand a legitimate difference between various shades of immigrants in this country..
________
Suzuki XN85 (http://www.cyclechaos.com/wiki/Suzuki_XN85)
________
Suzuki XN85 (http://www.cyclechaos.com/wiki/Suzuki_XN85)
more...
makeup hot tattoo Megan Fox in June
justin150377
09-19 07:12 PM
How about working on an EAD in a part-time job while working full-time on your h1 sponsored job? I assume the h1 will not become invalid in this case because EAD is being used for the part time job.
girlfriend Megan Fox @ quot;Transformers:
Blog Feeds
09-01 10:00 AM
Hunton Immigration and Nationality Law Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
The U.S. Department of State has confirmed that contractors on a pre-approved list (http://www.huntonfiles.com/files/webupload/Immigration_DOS_KCC_Approved_Auditor_List_Aug_2010 .pdf)at the Kentucky Consular Center (KCC) are now auditing approved nonimmigrant petitions -- including H-1B and L-1 petitions -- in order to verify that information contained in the petitions is correct. The audits are creating significant delays for petition-based visa applicants at embassies worldwide.
Auditors may make a "cold call" to the U.S. employer who filed the petition, asking about the company's activities, location, employees, shareholders, etc., and may also review the company's website or use Google Earth to confirm the existence of a facility in the location specified on the petition. Contractors may also ask employers about the beneficiaries of these petitions -- the foreign nationals whom the employer wishes to employ (or continue employing) in nonimmigrant status.
Following verification, the contractors will create new "base petitioner records" in the KCC's Petition Information Management Service (PIMS) database. Until KCC verifies the petitions and updates these records, no consular officer at a U.S. embassy abroad may issue a petition-based visa to an applicant. Consular officers are also instructed to question visa applicants further in order to determine if the beneficiary information in the updated PIMS record is correct and complete.
Any adverse information the KCC contractor learns during an audit call may lead to denial of a beneficiary's visa application, even based on a previously approved petition, and may also affect the approvability of future petitions. Therefore, a U.S. employer who receives such a call should contact immigration counsel prior to providing any information so that (a) the auditor's name and credentials can be compared against the approved list (http://www.huntonfiles.com/files/webupload/Immigration_DOS_KCC_Approved_Auditor_List_Aug_2010 .pdf); (b) counsel can be present on the call; (c) the employer can prepare adequately by reviewing the petition; and (d) the call can be documented appropriately.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/hh_pmij8WeY
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/hh_pmij8WeY/)
The U.S. Department of State has confirmed that contractors on a pre-approved list (http://www.huntonfiles.com/files/webupload/Immigration_DOS_KCC_Approved_Auditor_List_Aug_2010 .pdf)at the Kentucky Consular Center (KCC) are now auditing approved nonimmigrant petitions -- including H-1B and L-1 petitions -- in order to verify that information contained in the petitions is correct. The audits are creating significant delays for petition-based visa applicants at embassies worldwide.
Auditors may make a "cold call" to the U.S. employer who filed the petition, asking about the company's activities, location, employees, shareholders, etc., and may also review the company's website or use Google Earth to confirm the existence of a facility in the location specified on the petition. Contractors may also ask employers about the beneficiaries of these petitions -- the foreign nationals whom the employer wishes to employ (or continue employing) in nonimmigrant status.
Following verification, the contractors will create new "base petitioner records" in the KCC's Petition Information Management Service (PIMS) database. Until KCC verifies the petitions and updates these records, no consular officer at a U.S. embassy abroad may issue a petition-based visa to an applicant. Consular officers are also instructed to question visa applicants further in order to determine if the beneficiary information in the updated PIMS record is correct and complete.
Any adverse information the KCC contractor learns during an audit call may lead to denial of a beneficiary's visa application, even based on a previously approved petition, and may also affect the approvability of future petitions. Therefore, a U.S. employer who receives such a call should contact immigration counsel prior to providing any information so that (a) the auditor's name and credentials can be compared against the approved list (http://www.huntonfiles.com/files/webupload/Immigration_DOS_KCC_Approved_Auditor_List_Aug_2010 .pdf); (b) counsel can be present on the call; (c) the employer can prepare adequately by reviewing the petition; and (d) the call can be documented appropriately.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/hh_pmij8WeY
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/hh_pmij8WeY/)
hairstyles Megan Fox @ quot;Transformers:
glus
09-24 09:17 AM
[QUOTE=njboy;949731]You wrote-"(I am certified in both the subject)"
I am certified in both the subjects
Maybe you should attend some ESL classes yourself before teaching it.[/QU
everybody makes mistakes...
I am certified in both the subjects
Maybe you should attend some ESL classes yourself before teaching it.[/QU
everybody makes mistakes...
good idea
02-17 03:23 PM
Thanks guys... for your replies (for information)... for me it's normal processing...
I hope for the best...
regards...
I hope for the best...
regards...
chanduv23
09-12 04:16 PM
Ivan is a doctor from Mexico. He did his resiidency at Mainmonaides in New York and now works as an attending physician at Cleveland Clinic. Clevland clinic is planning to promote him as a program director but Ivan wont be here next year, his Green Card petition has been pending FBI checks for 3 years now and he is frustrated about the process and plans to move back to Mexico and start his own hospital.
Lets strive to keep Pablo and Ivan in the US.
Lets March to DC on September 18th for the Legal highly skilled immigrants rally
Lets strive to keep Pablo and Ivan in the US.
Lets March to DC on September 18th for the Legal highly skilled immigrants rally
No comments:
Post a Comment